Our own two, compared
Our two projects at Sompura Gate on Sarjapur Road, set beside each other honestly — including the parts of each that will not suit you. Every figure below is read from the same project data our RERA page uses.
What this page is
A developer comparing its own two projects has an obvious temptation: present them as complementary, declare that both are excellent, and let the reader work it out. That is a brochure with two columns. This page tries to do the harder thing — state what actually differs, say plainly who each one is not for, and leave the decision where it belongs.
The two sit at the same junction, so the things a comparison usually leans on — the corridor, the connectivity, the neighbourhood — are the same for both and settle nothing. What differs is scale, density, the mix of homes, the registration each holds and its dates, and the survey land each is registered on. Those are the rows below, and every one of them is read from our project data rather than written into this page.
Two things are deliberately absent. No price, because no price appears anywhere on this website — the cost sheet is issued against a specific unit and that is where a real number belongs. And no completion or possession date: a RERA registration has a validity period, that period is a fact about the registration, and presenting it as a handover date would be a misrepresentation of the certificate.
Facts on this page last reviewed on . Registrations, statutes and administrative practice all change; check the source as well as this page.
Side by side
Read from the same project data our RERA page and our project pages use, so these rows cannot drift from them. Where a row is identical for both projects it is printed anyway — omitting the rows that settle nothing is how a comparison quietly chooses your conclusion for you.
Settled by The registration certificate's survey details, not the postal address. Both projects sit at the same junction, so this row settles nothing between them — it is here because a comparison that quietly omits the identical rows is choosing which differences you get to see.
Settled by The registration certificate. Both are Karnataka projects, so the regulator, the registering department, the stamp legislation and the revenue record are the same for both.
Settled by The sanctioned plan and the extent recorded against the survey numbers.
Settled by The sanctioned plan and the unit schedule filed with the registration. This is the row from which the density difference — and most of what follows from it — comes.
Settled by The carpet area stated in the agreement for sale for the specific unit, as section 2(k) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 defines it. The areas above are the published configuration ranges, which is a different thing from a unit's carpet area — ask for the latter in writing.
Settled by A search for the number on the Karnataka regulator's own register. The promoter on the certificate is the registered legal entity; the trading brand differs, and aggregator listings routinely print the brand.
Where the current figure is published Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (K-RERA) — the register of real estate projects and agents in Karnataka, with each project's registration, promoter and filings. We print no rate.
Settled by The certificate, and an encumbrance certificate taken against those survey numbers from the Karnataka registering department.
Where the current figure is published Karnataka Department of Stamps and Registration — the stamp duty and registration fee applicable in Karnataka, and the guideline values used to assess them. We print no rate.
Settled by The certificate. Neither date is a possession, completion or handover date, and neither should be read as one. What the promoter is obliged to deliver, and by when, is in the agreement for sale — ask for the draft and read that clause.
Where the current figure is published Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (K-RERA) — the register of real estate projects and agents in Karnataka, with each project's registration, promoter and filings. We print no rate.
Settled by The certificate or pre-certificate issued by the Indian Green Building Council for the specific project. No SUYUG project holds a final IGBC certificate. That is awarded only after a completed building has been verified against what was submitted. Ask for the document by name, and treat "pre-certified" and "designed to IGBC guidelines" as the two different claims they are.
| Dimension | THE1 | Saffron |
|---|---|---|
| Where each one is | Sompura Gate, Sarjapura, Bengaluru | Sompura Gate, Sarjapura, Bengaluru |
Settled by The registration certificate's survey details, not the postal address. Both projects sit at the same junction, so this row settles nothing between them — it is here because a comparison that quietly omits the identical rows is choosing which differences you get to see. | ||
| Jurisdiction | Bengaluru Urban district, Karnataka | Bengaluru Urban district, Karnataka |
Settled by The registration certificate. Both are Karnataka projects, so the regulator, the registering department, the stamp legislation and the revenue record are the same for both. | ||
| The land parcel | 3.5 Acres | 2.5 Acres |
Settled by The sanctioned plan and the extent recorded against the survey numbers. | ||
| How many homes | 235 Units | 110 Units |
Settled by The sanctioned plan and the unit schedule filed with the registration. This is the row from which the density difference — and most of what follows from it — comes. | ||
| Configurations, with areas as published | 3 BHK Luxury — 1601 – 1939 sq.ft. 4 BHK Luxury Penthouse — 3122 – 3573 sq.ft | 3 BHK Premium — 1896 & 1976 sq.ft. 3 BHK Grande — 2088 sq.ft. 4 BHK Luxury — 2543 & 2612 sq.ft |
Settled by The carpet area stated in the agreement for sale for the specific unit, as section 2(k) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 defines it. The areas above are the published configuration ranges, which is a different thing from a unit's carpet area — ask for the latter in writing. | ||
| Registration, in full | K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/051224/007268. Promoter as named on the certificate: SUYUG CONSTRUCTIONS. | K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/140825/008000. Promoter as named on the certificate: SUYUG CONSTRUCTIONS. |
Settled by A search for the number on the Karnataka regulator's own register. The promoter on the certificate is the registered legal entity; the trading brand differs, and aggregator listings routinely print the brand. Where the current figure is published Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (K-RERA) — the register of real estate projects and agents in Karnataka, with each project's registration, promoter and filings. We print no rate. | ||
| The land it is registered on | Sy. Nos. 27/1 & 27/2, Sompura Village, Sarjapura Hobli, Anekal Taluk | Sy. No. 516, Sarjapura Village, Sarjapura Hobli, Anekal Taluk |
Settled by The certificate, and an encumbrance certificate taken against those survey numbers from the Karnataka registering department. Where the current figure is published Karnataka Department of Stamps and Registration — the stamp duty and registration fee applicable in Karnataka, and the guideline values used to assess them. We print no rate. | ||
| Registration dates — and what they are not | Approved by the authority on 5 December 2024. The registration is stated to be valid to 31 March 2028. | Approved by the authority on 14 August 2025. The registration is stated to be valid to 31 December 2028. |
Settled by The certificate. Neither date is a possession, completion or handover date, and neither should be read as one. What the promoter is obliged to deliver, and by when, is in the agreement for sale — ask for the draft and read that clause. Where the current figure is published Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (K-RERA) — the register of real estate projects and agents in Karnataka, with each project's registration, promoter and filings. We print no rate. | ||
| IGBC standing | IGBC pre-certified. No level is stated, here or anywhere on this site. | IGBC pre-certified. No level is stated, here or anywhere on this site. |
Settled by The certificate or pre-certificate issued by the Indian Green Building Council for the specific project. No SUYUG project holds a final IGBC certificate. That is awarded only after a completed building has been verified against what was submitted. Ask for the document by name, and treat "pre-certified" and "designed to IGBC guidelines" as the two different claims they are. | ||
Reading the table
Three notes on how to use the rows above. None of them tells you which project to buy, because the honest answer to that depends on how large a community you want to live in — and we cannot see that from here.
The unit counts and land parcels in the table above are the whole of this difference. A larger project funds more amenity and more shared open space, and puts more households through every gate, lift lobby and amenity at the same hours. A smaller one reverses both halves of that sentence. Neither is the better answer; they are answers to different questions.
The configurations table is read from our project data, and it is the first filter worth applying. If the configuration you need is not listed against a project, no other row matters — and we would rather you found that out on this page than after a site visit.
Each registration carries an approval date and a validity period, both printed below from the certificate. An earlier approval date means the project has been registered for longer; it does not mean the building is further advanced, and we will not imply that it does. Ask for the current construction status and the quarterly filings on the regulator's register.
Including the unflattering half
Both of these are ours, which removes every excuse for hedging. A developer that cannot say where its own project is weaker is telling you only that it would rather not.
Suits
A household that wants the amenity scale, the podium-level open space and the setbacks that only a larger project can fund, and is comfortable living high with several hundred other households sharing the same gates, lifts and facilities.
Weaker on
Density and dependence. More homes means more people at every lift lobby, driveway and amenity at peak hours, a larger association whose decisions are harder for one owner to influence, and a longer list of engineered systems — lifts, pumps, generators, fire systems — whose upkeep you pay for every month whether or not you use them.
Suits
A household that would rather know its neighbours than have more facilities, wants a smaller community and less pressure on everything shared, and is content to use the neighbourhood for what a bigger project would provide inside its boundary.
Weaker on
Scale. Fewer homes means less to fund with — a shorter amenity list, less scope for professional facility management, and a smaller association that depends heavily on a handful of owners doing the work of chasing a promoter or a contractor.
Neither paragraph above is a reason not to buy either project. They are the trade-offs that follow arithmetically from the unit counts and land parcels in the table — which is why we can state them without guessing. What we cannot state is which trade-off suits you.
Ask us these
Ask them of us, and ask the same five of anyone else you are considering. A page that publishes the questions it expects to be asked has made itself easier to check, which is the point.
The method behind those questions — thirteen things to line up and the document that settles each — is set out on how to compare two projects.
They are at the same junction, so you can walk both and form your own view. Ask for the registration certificate, the sanctioned plan and the carpet area at each one — and tell us which of the two you liked less, and why.
